Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background: A lack of geographic and racial diversity in clinical trial populations may arise from a disproportionate focus on the United States and Europe for trial leadership and conduct. Inadequate diversity may compromise the external validity to the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region, where 60% of global cardiometabolic disease exists. Objectives: This study aimed to assess the proportion and trends of Asian race participants and APAC authorship in cardiometabolic trials. Methods: between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2020. Trial leadership was defined by first authorship, and any listed author was considered a trial collaborator. Temporal trends were evaluated using the Jonckheere-Terpstra proportion test and correlations using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Participant-to-prevalence ratios (PPR) were determined using Global Health Data Exchange registry data. Results: = 0.003) enrollment was observed; however, severe regional underrepresentation persisted (PPR <0.30). Conclusions: Despite a favorable trend over the past decade, Asian participants and authors from APAC remain significantly underrepresented in seminal cardiometabolic trials; barriers to trial conduct and leadership in this region must be addressed.
Azzopardi et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: