Higher visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability (highest vs lowest tertile) was associated with a greater risk of major cardiovascular events (HR 1.15; 95% CI 1.00-1.32).
Meta-Analysis (n=18,415)
Yes
Does higher visit-to-visit blood pressure variability increase the risk of major cardiovascular events in high-risk individuals?
18,415 high-risk individuals from the SPRINT and ACCORD trials with ≥3 blood pressure visits
Higher visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability (highest tertile of variation independent of mean, SBP-VIM)
Lower visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability (lowest tertile of SBP-VIM)
Major cardiovascular events (composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death)composite
Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability is independently associated with an increased risk of major cardiovascular events, exhibiting a J-shaped relationship that provides prognostic value comparable to mean blood pressure.
Effect estimate: HR 1.15 (95% CI 1.00-1.32)
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Blood pressure variability (BPV) is associated with cardiovascular risk and has been shown to confer prognostic information independent of mean blood pressure (BP). However, the consistency of its incremental predictive value across different clinical settings and populations warrants further investigation. A patient-level pooled analysis of two large randomized trials (SPRINT and ACCORD) was conducted to clarify the association between BPV and major cardiovascular events (MCEs). METHODS: Visit-to-visit BPV was calculated from Month 3 onwards using multiple metrics (including variation independent of mean, VIM) in participants with ≥3 visits. Associations between BPV and MCEs (myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death) were assessed using Cox regression and restricted cubic splines. RESULTS: Among 18 415 participants (median 12 BP measurements; 3.6-year follow-up), 1244 (6.8%) experienced MCEs. After multivariable adjustment, higher SBP-VIM (highest vs lowest tertile) was associated with a greater risk of MCEs (hazard ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.32), with similar associations for myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death. Restricted cubic spline analyses revealed a J-shaped relationship between SBP-VIM and cardiovascular outcomes (all P < .05). The prognostic value of SBP-VIM was comparable to mean SBP. These findings were consistent across alternative BPV metrics and intensified with extended follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Visit-to-visit BPV was independently associated with the risk of MCEs, particularly myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death, with a J-shaped relationship indicating that both low and high BPV may be harmful. This association was independent of mean BP and comparable in prognostic value, underscoring the need to determine optimal BPV targets and explore potential BPV-modulating interventions.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Wenbo Zhao
Capital Medical University
Yue Qiao
Capital Medical University
Lupei Cai
University of Cambridge
European Heart Journal
University of Cambridge
Capital Medical University
Cambridge School
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zhao et al. (Wed,) conducted a meta-analysis in High cardiovascular risk (n=18,415). Higher systolic blood pressure variability (highest tertile SBP-VIM) vs. Lowest tertile SBP-VIM was evaluated on Major cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death) (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.00-1.32). Higher visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability (highest vs lowest tertile) was associated with a greater risk of major cardiovascular events (HR 1.15; 95% CI 1.00-1.32).
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a080b17a487c87a6a40d1ef — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehag330
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: