Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
A large number of reports from prestigious national organizations, for example, the National Academy's reports on the Engineer of 2020, Some of this urgency is due to changes in the skills and knowledge that engineering graduates need to deal with the complex, interdisciplinary nature of current engineering problems, as exemplified by the engineering grand challenges identified by the National Academy. An additional factor is the change in the engineering student population; for example, the demographics, web experiences, and patience with textbooks and lectures have evolved substantially in the last few decades. Finally, recent developments in learning science have shown that engaging, authentic instructional experiences enhance student learning as summarized in the How People Learn framework. rtainly, large-scale faculty development efforts will be necessary to accomplish these changes, but the current models for faculty development have had limited impact. The present study explores a new faculty development model that may meet the need for a sustainable, economical, effective approach to support ongoing efforts to advance engineering education. The model builds on the existing face-to-face faculty development models, on the engaging community of practice models, and on the rapidly developing web-based social networking and content management tools. It utilizes virtual communities of practice (VCP) to help faculty members understand and implement research-based instructional approaches.
Pimmel et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: