Cardiac arrhythmias in athletes range from benign sinus bradyarrhythmias to life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, which typically occur in the setting of structural heart disease.
Provides a clinical overview of the evaluation and significance of various cardiac arrhythmias in athletes, emphasizing the distinction between benign physiological adaptations and potentially life-threatening conditions associated with structural heart disease.
Cardiac arrhythmias in the athlete are a frequent cause for concern. Some arrhythmias may be benign and asymptomatic, but others may be life threatening and a sign that serious cardiovascular disease is present. Physicians often are consulted with regard to arrhythmias, or symptoms consistent with arrhythmias, in athletes. Sinus bradyarrhythmias are common and even expected in athletes. These bradyarrhythmias are rarely a cause for concern. Heart block is unusual and merits a thorough workup. Atrial fibrillation may be more common in the athlete. Supraventricular tachycardias other than atrial fibrillation generally warrant consideration of radiofrequency ablation for cure of the tachyarrhythmia. Ventricular arrhythmias in the athlete generally occur in the setting of structural heart disease that is genetically determined (hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia, anomalous coronary arteries) or acquired (coronary artery disease, myocarditis, idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathies). In these conditions, the arrhythmia generally is life threatening. Ventricular arrhythmias that occur in the athlete without structural heart disease are not thought to be life threatening. Athletes with structural heart disease and syncope and those with exertional syncope merit a complete evaluation.
Link et al. (Mon,) conducted a review in Cardiac arrhythmias in athletes. Cardiac arrhythmias in athletes range from benign sinus bradyarrhythmias to life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, which typically occur in the setting of structural heart disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: