Amlodipine/valsartan 10/160 mg compared to 5/160 mg achieved blood pressure control in 74.8% vs 72.7% of patients and provided significantly greater reductions in systolic blood pressure (P=0.0003).
RCT (n=894)
Double-blind
Randomized
Yes
Does amlodipine/valsartan 10/160 mg improve blood pressure control compared to amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg in patients with hypertension uncontrolled by previous monotherapy?
Switching to amlodipine/valsartan combination therapy provides significant blood pressure reductions in patients uncontrolled on monotherapy, with the 10/160 mg dose offering greater reductions than the 5/160 mg dose.
Absolute Event Rate: 74.8% vs 72.7%
In this randomized, double-blind, multicenter study, patients whose blood pressure (BP) was uncontrolled by monotherapy were switched directly to amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg (n=443) or 10/160 mg (n=451). After 16 weeks, BP control (levels <140/90 mm Hg or <130/80 mm Hg for diabetics) was achieved in 72.7% (95% confidence interval CI, 68.6-76.9) of patients receiving amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg and in 74.8% (95% CI, 70.8-78.9) receiving amlodipine/valsartan 10/160 mg. Incremental reductions from baseline in mean sitting systolic and diastolic BP were significantly greater with the higher dose (20.0+/-0.7 vs 17.5+/-0.7 mm Hg; P=.0003 and 11.6+/-0.4 vs 10.4+/-0.4 mm Hg; P=.0046). Incremental BP reductions were also achieved with both regimens irrespective of previous monotherapy, hypertension severity, diabetic status, body mass index, and age. Peripheral edema was the most frequent adverse event. These results provide support for the BP-lowering benefits of complementary antihypertensive therapy with amlodipine and valsartan in patients with hypertension uncontrolled by previous monotherapy.
Allemann et al. (Sat,) conducted a rct in Hypertension uncontrolled by monotherapy (n=894). Amlodipine/valsartan vs. Amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg was evaluated on Blood pressure control (<140/90 mm Hg or <130/80 mm Hg for diabetics). Amlodipine/valsartan 10/160 mg compared to 5/160 mg achieved blood pressure control in 74.8% vs 72.7% of patients and provided significantly greater reductions in systolic blood pressure (P=0.0003).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: