Abstract Background Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease that continues to have high morbidity and mortality. There are only 3 approved medications, (nintedanib, pirfenidone and nerandomilast) which marginally slow FVC decline and only nerandomilast having some mortality benefit. All three have no effect on quality of life (exacerbations and hospitalizations). There is an urgent need to find more effective treatment options. Since IPF is predominantly a disease of the elderly with a peak prevalence in those 65 and older, it is common for these individuals to have other comorbidities such as Hyperlipidemia (HLD). Interestingly, in a prior small study of IPF patients, there is evidence to suggest clinical benefit from ezetimibe, a medication used to treat HLD. This study aims to further evaluate the clinical benefits of ezetimibe in patients with IPF in a large national cohort. Methods We conducted this study using the Optum Labs Data Warehouse (OLDW). The OLDW contains de-identified administrative claims data, including medical and pharmacy claims and enrollment records. This study used claims data from commercial, Medicare Advantage (MA), and Medicare Fee-for-service (FFS) enrollees between October 1st, 2014, and December 31st, 2021. Diagnosis of IPF was defined using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. Patients without a diagnosis of IPF were excluded. P 0.05 was set to determine statistical significance. Two matched patient cohorts depending on ezetimibe use were defined. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary outcome was hospitalizations. Results We identified 7724 patients with IPF. After adjusting for age, age group, gender, race, health plan, year of IPF diagnosis, smoking, diabetes, statin treatment, and antifibrotic treatment, two cohorts were identified and matched, patients treated with ezetimibe (n = 3862) and patients not treated with ezetimibe (n = 3862). Among the patients with IPF treated with ezetimibe, ezetimibe use was associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 95% CI: 0.704 0.660 - 0.752, p-value: 0.001) and hospitalizations(hazard ratio 95% CI: 0.907 0.857 - 0.959, p-value: 0.001) compared to patients not treated with ezetimibe. Conclusion In patients with IPF, treatment with ezetimibe may be associated with improved clinical outcomes. Further studies are necessary to confirm benefits, assess anti-fibrotic effects, and inform implementation in management of IPF. As IPF remains a disease with limited treatment options, repurposing drugs continues to offer an avenue to find affordable, safe and already approved medications for use. This abstract is funded by: None
Gyimah et al. (Fri,) studied this question.