Noninvasive echo-Doppler estimation of pulmonary arterial wave reflection agreed well with invasive catheter measurements, showing a mean difference in backward pressure of 0.4 mmHg.
Does Doppler echocardiography accurately estimate pulmonary arterial wave reflection compared to invasive catheter measurements in a canine model of acute pulmonary embolism?
Doppler echocardiography provides a reasonable, non-invasive estimation of pulmonary arterial wave reflection, offering a potential tool for integrative assessment of right ventricular afterload in pulmonary hypertension.
Effect estimate: Mean difference 0.4 mmHg (95% CI -4.3 to 5.0)
Background: Pulmonary arterial (PA) wave reflection provides additional information for assessing right ventricular afterload, but its applications is hampered by the need for invasive pressure and flow measurements. We tested the hypothesis that PA pressure and flow waveforms estimated by Doppler echocardiography could be used to quantify PA wave reflection. Methods: Doppler echocardiographic images of tricuspid regurgitation and right ventricular outflow tract flow used to estimate PA pressure and flow waveforms were acquired simultaneously with direct measurements with a dual sensor-tipped catheter under various hemodynamic conditions in a canine model of pulmonary hypertension ( n = 8). Wave separation analysis was performed on echo-Doppler derived as well as catheter derived waveforms to separate PA pressure into forward (Pf) and backward (Pb) pressures and derive wave reflection coefficient (RC) defined as the ratio of peak Pb to peak Pf. Results: Wave reflection indices by echo-Doppler agreed well with corresponding indices by catheter (Pb: mean difference = 0.4 mmHg, 95% limits of agreement = −4.3 to 5.0 mmHg; RC: bias = 0.13, 95% limits of agreement = −0.25 to 0.26). RC correlated negatively with PA compliance. Conclusion: This echo-Doppler method yields reasonable measurement of reflected wave in the pulmonary circulation, paving the way to a more integrative assessment of pulmonary hemodynamics in the clinical setting.
Yoshida et al. (Wed,) conducted a other in Acute Pulmonary Embolism / Pulmonary Hypertension (n=8). Echo-Doppler estimation of pulmonary arterial wave reflection vs. Invasive dual sensor-tipped catheter measurements was evaluated on Agreement of backward pressure (Pb) between echo-Doppler and catheter (Mean difference 0.4 mmHg, 95% CI -4.3 to 5.0). Noninvasive echo-Doppler estimation of pulmonary arterial wave reflection agreed well with invasive catheter measurements, showing a mean difference in backward pressure of 0.4 mmHg.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: