Cardiothoracic ratio showed only a weak, negative correlation with left ventricular ejection fraction (r=-0.176) and could not accurately determine systolic function in patients with heart failure.
Cross-Sectional (n=7,476)
Does cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) measured from chest roentgenogram accurately estimate left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) in patients with congestive heart failure?
Cardiothoracic ratio measured from chest X-rays correlates poorly with left ventricular ejection fraction and should not be used to estimate systolic function in patients with heart failure.
Effect estimate: r=-0.176
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) is a valuable prognostic index in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). Although EF can be readily measured, many clinicians use roentgenographic heart size as a clue to differentiate systolic from diastolic dysfunction, even in the absence of solid supportive data. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that the cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) measured from the chest roentgenogram can be used to estimate left ventricular EF in individuals with CHF. METHODS: To answer this question, the database of the Digitalis Investigation Group trial was used. The CTR, determined using the Danzer method, and quantitative EF, measured locally using angiographic, radionuclide, or 2-dimensional echocardiographic techniques, were compared in 7476 patients with clinical CHF (New York Heart Association functional classes I-IV) due to acquired left-sided cardiac disease of ischemic, hypertensive, idiopathic, and alcohol-related causes. RESULTS: Mean (+/-SD) CTR for the cohort was 0.53+/-.07. Mean (+/-SD) EF was 31.7%+/-12.2%. A weak, negative correlation between CTR and EF was observed (r=-0.176). Similar findings were obtained when the results were stratified by cause of CHF, presence of clinically defined right ventricular dysfunction, and method of EF measurement. Categorical analysis failed to yield a CTR cutoff point that facilitated useful segregation of individuals with an EF greater than 35% or 35% and below; greater than 40% or 40% and below; and greater than 45% or 45% and below in any patient group. CONCLUSIONS: Although a weak, negative correlation exists between CTR and EF, this relationship does not allow for accurate determination of systolic function in individual patients with CHF. Considering the morbidity and mortality associated with CHF, and the clinical implications of systolic function in this syndrome, direct measurement of EF is recommended.
E.F. Philbin (Mon,) conducted a cross-sectional in Congestive heart failure (CHF) (n=7,476). Cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) vs. Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) was evaluated on Correlation between cardiothoracic ratio and left ventricular ejection fraction (r=-0.176). Cardiothoracic ratio showed only a weak, negative correlation with left ventricular ejection fraction (r=-0.176) and could not accurately determine systolic function in patients with heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: