Patients considered for LVAD weaning showed a more rapid increase in LV systolic work index during exercise compared to those undergoing hemodynamic optimization (slope 46.3 vs. -0.625; p=0.044).
Cohort (n=8)
Does left heart catheterization with exercise reveal differences in LV systolic and diastolic responses between LVAD patients evaluated for weaning versus hemodynamic optimization?
Patients with favorable remodeling on LVAD support (weaning candidates) demonstrate significantly improved LV systolic and diastolic responses to exercise compared to those undergoing hemodynamic optimization.
Absolute Event Rate: 46.3% vs -0.625%
p-value: p=0.044
ABSTRACT Background Addition of left heart catheterization (LHC) to exercise protocols allows for a unique focus on parameters of systolic and diastolic responses to increased activity in patients with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support. Methods A retrospective review was conducted of all consecutive adult patients who underwent LHC with exercise for any indication from June 2017 to June 2023. For all patients, the relationship between exercise and parameters of LV systolic and diastolic response was assessed. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on the indication for testing: hemodynamic optimization (Optim, n = 5) or weaning consideration (Wean, n = 3). Results Eight patients (88% male, median age 57 years (IQR 44, 65)) were included. LVEF was 45% (IQR 45, 56) in Wean and 25% (IQR 20, 42) in Optim. LV systolic work index (LVSWI) increased more rapidly over levels of exercise in Wean vs. Optim (slope 46.3 vs. −0.625; p = 0.044) and LVSWI rose more quickly at lower levels of LV end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) in Wean vs. Optim (slope 219.5 vs. −2.008; p = 0.0026). Pulse power index was higher in Wean patients at baseline (0.046 (IQR 0.04, 0.07) vs. 0.016 (IQR 0.001, 0.04); p = 0.14) and peak exercise (0.12 (IQR 0.12, 0.12) vs. 0.06 (IQR 0.03, 0.1); p = 0.29). Conclusions Patients with favorable remodeling on LVAD support have significantly improved LV systolic and diastolic responses to exercise and a trend of higher systemic pulsatility. Improving our understanding of LV‐LVAD interactions with activity may aid in future efforts to improve exercise tolerance through speed modulation.
Inglis et al. (Thu,) führten eine Kohorte in der kontinuierlichen Flussunterstützung des linken Ventrikels (LVAD) durch (n=8). Die Berücksichtigung des Weanings im Vergleich zur hämodynamischen Optimierung wurde anhand des Anstiegs des systolischen Arbeitsindex des linken Ventrikels (LVSWI) über verschiedene Trainingsniveaus bewertet (p=0,044). Patienten, die für das Weaning vom LVAD in Betracht gezogen wurden, zeigten während des Trainings einen schnelleren Anstieg des LV systolischen Arbeitsindex im Vergleich zu denjenigen, die einer hämodynamischen Optimierung unterzogen wurden (Anstieg 46,3 vs. -0,625; p=0,044).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: