Finerenone, a novel nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, shows promising potential for treating heart failure and diabetic kidney disease, pending results from Phase III trials.
Does finerenone improve outcomes and reduce the risk of hyperkalemia in patients with heart failure and diabetic kidney disease?
Finerenone is a novel nonsteroidal MRA that may offer a safer alternative to traditional MRAs in patients with heart failure and diabetic kidney disease by reducing the risk of hyperkalemia.
INTRODUCTION: The mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) spironolactone and eplerenone reduce the risk of hospitalizations and mortality in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), and attenuate progression of diabetic kidney disease. However, their use is limited by the fear of inducing hyperkalemia, especially in patients with renal dysfunction. Finerenone is a novel nonsteroidal MRA, with higher selectivity toward the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) compared to spironolactone and stronger MR-binding affinity than eplerenone. AREAS COVERED: This paper discusses the chemistry, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety of finerenone. EXPERT OPINION: The selectivity and greater binding affinity of finerenone to the MR may reduce the risk of hyperkalemia and renal dysfunction and thereby overcome the reluctance to start and uptitrate MRAs in patients with HF and diabetic kidney disease. Studies conducted in patients with HFrEF and moderate chronic kidney disease and diabetic kidney disease, showed promising results. Phase III trials will have to show whether finerenone might become the third-generation MRA for the treatment of HF and diabetic kidney disease.
Liu et al. (Sat,) conducted a review in Heart failure and diabetic kidney disease. Finerenone was evaluated. Finerenone, a novel nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, shows promising potential for treating heart failure and diabetic kidney disease, pending results from Phase III trials.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: