Bioprosthetic heart valves elicited significant increases in anti-αGal and anti-Neu5Gc IgGs post-implantation, with early signs of structural valve degeneration appearing in 4.9% of recipients within 2 years.
Cohort (n=1,668)
Yes
Do antibody responses against immunogenic glycans (αGal and Neu5Gc) mediate bioprosthetic heart valve deterioration through calcification?
Immune responses against xenoantigens αGal and Neu5Gc mediate bioprosthetic heart valve calcification, suggesting that using donor tissues deficient in these antigens could improve valve durability.
Bioprosthetic heart valves (BHVs) are commonly used to replace severely diseased heart valves but their susceptibility to structural valve degeneration (SVD) limits their use in young patients. We hypothesized that antibodies against immunogenic glycans present on BHVs, particularly antibodies against the xenoantigens galactose-α1,3-galactose (αGal) and N-glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5Gc), could mediate their deterioration through calcification. We established a large longitudinal prospective international cohort of patients (n = 1668, 34 ± 43 months of follow-up (0.1-182); 4,998 blood samples) to investigate the hemodynamics and immune responses associated with BHVs up to 15 years after aortic valve replacement. Early signs of SVD appeared in <5% of BHV recipients within 2 years. The levels of both anti-αGal and anti-Neu5Gc IgGs significantly increased one month after BHV implantation. The levels of these IgGs declined thereafter but anti-αGal IgG levels declined significantly faster in control patients compared to BHV recipients. Neu5Gc, anti-Neu5Gc IgG and complement deposition were found in calcified BHVs at much higher levels than in calcified native aortic valves. Moreover, in mice, anti-Neu5Gc antibodies were unable to promote calcium deposition on subcutaneously implanted BHV tissue engineered to lack αGal and Neu5Gc antigens. These results indicate that BHVs manufactured using donor tissues deficient in αGal and Neu5Gc could be less prone to immune-mediated deterioration and have improved durability.
Sénage et al. (Tue,) conducted a cohort in Aortic valve replacement (n=1,668). Bioprosthetic heart valve (BHV) implantation vs. Mechanical heart valve (MHV) or Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) was evaluated on Early signs of structural valve degeneration (SVD). Bioprosthetic heart valves elicited significant increases in anti-αGal and anti-Neu5Gc IgGs post-implantation, with early signs of structural valve degeneration appearing in 4.9% of recipients within 2 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: