Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In this paper, we use SPARC’s HSBs, and LSBs galaxies to verify two issues. The first one is related to one claim of Donato et al., (2009) D09, namely: Is the DM surface density (DMsd) a constant universal quantity, equal to log(Σ/M⊙pc−2)=2.15±0.2, or does it depend on the baryon surface density of the system? The second one, is based on a MOND prediction that for HSBs the DMsd is constant, and equal to log(Σ/M⊙pc−2)=2.14, while for LSBs the surface density is not constant and takes values that are smaller than for HSBs and D09 prediction (Milgrom, 2009). We find that HSBs show a constant DMsd vs magnitude as in D09, and a constant DMsd vs Σeff as in MOND prediction, for HSBs with Σeff>200L⊙/pc2, and Σeff>300L⊙/pc2. However, the value of the DMsd is larger, Σ≃2.61 (in the case of the DMsd-magnitude with Σeff>300L⊙/pc2), and Σ≃2.54 (in the case of the surface DMsd-surface brightness with Σeff>200L⊙/pc2). This value slightly depends on the threshold to determine whether a galaxy is HSB. In the case of LSBs, for Σeff−17, have smaller values than those predicted by D09. The DMsd vs Σeff shows a similar behavior in qualitative, but not quantitative, agreement with MOND predictions. In summary, in the case of HSBs both D09 and MOND are in qualitative, but not quantitative, agreement with the data. In the case of LSBs D09 is mainly in disagreement with the data, and MOND only in qualitative agreement with them.
Antonino Del Popolo (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: