The rapid development of artificial intelligence technologies, including neural network algorithms for content generation, requires a rethink of established intellectual property norms, especially in the context of copyright protection.The article examines legal conflicts related to the definition of authorship and rights to objects created by AI, including works of art, inventions and software products. Using the examples of cases from the USA, Europe and Asia, gaps in legislation are analyzed, as well as regulatory mechanisms are proposed, such as the differentiation of rights between AI developers and users, the introduction of mandatory content labeling and the harmonization of international standards. Special attention is paid to the ethical and economic consequences of automating creative processes, including the risks of monopolization and retraining programs for creative professions.
Usacheva et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: