Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Introduction Traditional criminal investigation often struggles to integrate dispersed and heterogeneous information, delaying the identification of serial or escalating patterns. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and cognitive computing offer data-driven approaches for cross-source correlation and temporal anomaly detection. Methods A focused narrative review of peer-reviewed literature on AI applications in forensic analysis, pattern detection, and investigative support was conducted using major multidisciplinary databases. Selected studies were synthesized into two analytical dimensions: evidence correlation and anomaly detection, and further examined through a retrospective case-based illustration. Results AI-based approaches support the linkage of low-level traces with higher-level events, enabling structured reconstruction and large-scale pattern identification. Machine learning models integrate heterogeneous data into operational representations, achieving high predictive performance under controlled conditions, often reported above 90% accuracy. Statistical and learning-based methods also detect temporal compression, behavioral drift, and cross-source anomalies, revealing patterns that may remain fragmented under manual analysis. Retrospective examination of historically fragmented cases highlights longitudinal regularities, including shrinking inter-event intervals, increasing severity, and the accumulation of weak signals that become meaningful when analyzed jointly. Discussion AI contributes primarily at a methodological level by enabling continuous integration and re-evaluation of investigative signals, supporting more data-informed and longitudinally grounded profiling practices. However, a gap persists between high performance in controlled settings and limited validation in real-world contexts. Future research should prioritize empirical benchmarking using operational datasets, the development of explainable and auditable systems, and governance frameworks ensuring transparent, accountable, and human-supervised deployment.
Buele et al. (Fri,) studied this question.