Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Four experiments examined the relation between behavioral expressions of dominance and the het-erosexual attractiveness of males and females. Predictions concerning the relation between domi-nance and heterosexual attraction were derived from a consideration of sex role norms and from the comparative biological literature. All four experiments indicated an interaction between dominance and sex of target. Dominance behavior increased the attractiveness of males, but had no effect on the attractiveness of females. The third study indicated that the effect did not depend on the sex of the rater or on the sex of those with whom the dominant target interacted. The fourth study showed that the effect was specific to dominance as an independent variable and did not occur for related constructs (aggressive or domineering). This study also found that manipulated dominance en-hanced only a males sexual attractiveness and not his general Usability. The results were discussed in terms of potential biological and cultural causal mechanisms. Concepts that refer to an individuals relative position in a social hierarchy occupy prominent positions in current models of personality and social behavior (Edelmarv Omark, 1973; Hogan, 1979,1982;StrayerStrayer, 1976). It has been argued
Sadalla et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: