Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
When obligations do not work in a balanced manner in fostering a household, disputes and arguments often occurs which will result in the termination of a marriage. Divorce can occur by various factors in a marriage. One of the factors that divorce causesare one among apostate husbands or wives, which if the marriage continues to be maintained will cause loss. As a result of the divorce because the husband has lapsed into marriage, the marriage is immediately finished, and if the marriage is fulfilled, a wife will not get mut'ah and a living from her husband, but it is different from being practiced in a religious court whose husband is burdened with giving mut ' ah and livelihood iddah. So with the existence of these problems the author will review the judges' considerations in considering their decisions and reviewing Islamic law. This study aims to find out about the definition of Mut'ah, the livelihood of iddah and apostasy, to find out the legal basis used by the judge in deciding cases and what according to the views viewed from Islamic law.To answer these three problems, the researcher used a qualitative approach with field research that collected data directly from the source. In qualitative research, the researcher is faced directly with the respondent, namely a direct interview by the Judge in the Nganjuk Religious Court.Based on the research, even though the husband apostatized and married the husband was still obliged to give mut'ah and livelihood because even though the apostate's husband would not obstruct the husband's obligation to his wife, and the divorce divorce case was equated with ordinary divorce divorce. Judges use the basis of article 149, 117, with reasons for divorce article 116 letter (f) and (h) KHI (Compilation of Islamic Law) and the results of RAKERNAS MARI in 2005. and viewed from a review of Islamic law judges use volcanic jurisprudence II if the termination of marriage because of apostasy does not require a court decision or judge's decision and is immediately canceled and does not see the consequences of the apostasy.
Fitriani et al. (Wed,) studied this question.