Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The precision of scale value estimates using maximum likelihood estimation is examined for varying numbers of categories, varying discriminal dispersions and with and without category boundary estimation. It is concluded that this type of estimation is somewhat unsatisfactory if boundaries are estimated unless these are of specific interest. If they are not estimated, it is concluded that using seven or more categories provides very nearly as much precision of estimate as a corresponding continuous judgment task.
J. O. Ramsay (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: