Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
PURPOSE: Electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated cine imaging in breath-hold enables high-quality diagnostics in most patients but can be compromised by arrhythmia and inability to hold breath. Real-time cardiac MRI offers faster and robust exams without these limitations. To achieve sufficient acceleration, advanced reconstruction methods, which transfer data into high-quality images, are required. METHODS: In this study, undersampled spiral balanced SSFP (bSSFP) real-time data in free-breathing were acquired at 1.5T in 16 healthy volunteers and five arrhythmic patients, with ECG-gated Cartesian cine in breath-hold serving as clinical reference. Image reconstructions were performed using a tailored and specifically trained score-based diffusion model, compared to a variational network and different compressed sensing approaches. The techniques were assessed using an expert reader study, scalar metric calculations, difference images against a segmented reference, and Bland-Altman analysis of cardiac functional parameters. RESULTS: In participants with irregular RR-cycles, spiral real-time acquisitions showed superior image quality compared to the clinical reference. Quantitative and qualitative metrics indicate enhanced image quality of the diffusion model in comparison to the alternative reconstruction methods, although improvements over the variational network were minor. Slightly higher ejection fractions for the real-time diffusion reconstructions were exhibited relative to the clinical references with a bias of 1.1 ± 5.7% for healthy subjects. CONCLUSION: The proposed real-time technique enables free-breathing acquisitions of spatio-temporal images with high quality, covering the entire heart in less than 1 min. Evaluation of ejection fraction using the ECG-gated reference can be vulnerable to arrhythmia and averaging effects, highlighting the need for real-time approaches. Prolonged inference times and stochastic variability of the diffusion reconstruction represent obstacles to overcome for clinical translation.
Schad et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: