Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Like many other governments, the D utch government has simultaneously pursued the contradictory goals of liberalising the housing market and countering the concentration of low‐income groups. This paper discusses how the tension between promoting market forces and countering segregation has played out, using A msterdam as a case study. The findings suggest that the policy may have mitigated but did not prevent a deepening division between the city's increasingly privileged core and its periphery. This is at least in part because social mixing was pursued also in neighbourhoods already prone to gentrification.
Uitermark et al. (Mon,) studied this question.