Long-term decarbonization of urban residential buildings in southern China depends on the joint evolution of building stock, end-use efficiency, and electricity carbon intensity. This study develops a dynamic stock-energy-carbon framework for urban residential buildings in China’s hot-summer warm-winter region from 2010 to 2060, using Guangdong, Guangxi, Fujian, and Hainan as case provinces. The model links demographic and housing-space change with stock survival, retrofit of the base-year stock, cohort-specific performance levels for post-2022 new construction, and time-varying provincial grid emission factors. EnergyPlus simulations of seven high-rise residential archetypes show that nearly zero-energy performance reduces province-level EUI by 19.2–26.5% relative to the baseline, with cooling-load reductions forming the dominant part of the improvement in the warmer provinces. Across coupled demand-side scenarios, stricter new-build performance standards reduce 2026–2060 cumulative operational energy by 5.3–10.1% relative to the conservative demand-side setting, while increasing retrofit intensity provides a smaller but consistent additional reduction. Carbon outcomes are more sensitive to electricity-sector assumptions: under the main demand-side setting, moving from the conservative to the accelerated grid pathway advances the operational-carbon peak by 8–15 years across the four provinces and lowers 2060 residual emissions by about 71%. A comparison with available observed provincial household-electricity statistics is added as a plausibility check; it confirms the relevant order of magnitude but also indicates that absolute demand estimates should be interpreted cautiously because of boundary and EUI-representation differences. These results suggest that demand-side efficiency policies must be coordinated with rapid provincial power-sector decarbonization if the residential sector in Hot-Summer Warm-Winter Region is to reach earlier carbon peaks and lower residual operational emissions.
Li et al. (Fri,) studied this question.