ChatGPT (GPT-4.0) generated responses to common spinal cord stimulation questions with strong reliability (5.1 ± 0.7), accuracy (2.7 ± 0.3), and comprehensibility (2.8 ± 0.2).
Observational (n=13)
Are ChatGPT's responses to common patient questions regarding spinal cord stimulation reliable, accurate, and comprehensible?
ChatGPT can serve as a reliable and comprehensible supplementary tool for patient education regarding general and procedural queries about spinal cord stimulation, though it struggles with highly technical questions.
Background: Although spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an effective treatment for managing chronic pain, many patients have understandable questions and concerns regarding this therapy. Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promise in delivering patient education in healthcare. This study evaluates the reliability, accuracy, and comprehensibility of ChatGPT’s responses to common patient inquiries about SCS. Methods: Thirteen commonly asked questions regarding SCS were selected based on the authors’ clinical experience managing chronic pain patients and a targeted review of patient education materials and relevant medical literature. The questions were prioritized based on their frequency in patient consultations, relevance to decision-making about SCS, and the complexity of the information typically required to comprehensively address the questions. These questions spanned three domains: pre-procedural, intra-procedural, and post-procedural concerns. Responses were generated using GPT-4.0 with the prompt “If you were a physician, how would you answer a patient asking…”. Responses were independently assessed by 10 pain physicians and two non-healthcare professionals using a Likert scale for reliability (1–6 points), accuracy (1–3 points), and comprehensibility (1–3 points). Results: ChatGPT’s responses demonstrated strong reliability (5.1 ± 0.7) and comprehensibility (2.8 ± 0.2), with 92% and 98% of responses, respectively, meeting or exceeding our predefined thresholds. Accuracy was 2.7 ± 0.3, with 95% of responses rated sufficiently accurate. General queries, such as “What is spinal cord stimulation?” and “What are the risks and benefits?”, received higher scores compared to technical questions like “What are the different types of waveforms used in SCS?”. Conclusions: ChatGPT can be implemented as a supplementary tool for patient education, particularly in addressing general and procedural queries about SCS. However, the AI’s performance was less robust in addressing highly technical or nuanced questions.
Bianco et al. (Fri,) conducted a observational in Chronic pain requiring spinal cord stimulation (n=13). ChatGPT (GPT-4.0) was evaluated on Reliability, accuracy, and comprehensibility of responses. ChatGPT (GPT-4.0) generated responses to common spinal cord stimulation questions with strong reliability (5.1 ± 0.7), accuracy (2.7 ± 0.3), and comprehensibility (2.8 ± 0.2).