VEGF-VEGFR inhibitors improve cancer survival but are associated with clinically relevant cardiovascular toxicities, particularly hypertension and heart disease, which may limit their use.
This review highlights the molecular mechanisms and clinical impact of cardiovascular toxicities, particularly hypertension and heart disease, associated with VEGF inhibitor therapy in cancer patients.
Physiologically, vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) and their receptors (VEGFR) play a critical role in vascular development, neogenesis, angiogenesis, endothelial function and vascular tone. Pathologically, VEGF-VEGFR signaling induces dysregulated angiogenesis, which contributes to the growth and spread of tumors. The development of VEGF-VEGFR inhibitors (VEGFIs) has thus proven to be a valuable strategy in the management of a number of malignancies, yielding improved survival outcomes. Not surprisingly, VEGFIs are now standard of care as first-line monotherapy for some cancers and the scope of this class of drugs is growing. However with the promise of improved outcomes, VEGFIs also led to clinically relevant toxicities, especially hypertension and cardiovascular disease (CVD). As such, cancer patients treated with VEGFIs may have improved cancer outcomes, but at the cost of an increased risk of CVD. Indeed, dose intensity and protracted use of these drugs can be limited by cardiovascular side effects and patients may require dose reduction or drug withdrawal, thus compromising anti-cancer efficacy and survival. Here we summarize the vascular biology of VEGF-VEGFR signaling and discuss the cardiovascular consequences and clinical impact of VEGFIs. New insights into molecular mechanisms whereby VEGFIs cause hypertension and heart disease are highlighted.
Touyz et al. (Tue,) conducted a review in Cancer and cardiovascular toxicities (hypertension, heart disease). VEGF-VEGFR inhibitors (VEGFIs) was evaluated. VEGF-VEGFR inhibitors improve cancer survival but are associated with clinically relevant cardiovascular toxicities, particularly hypertension and heart disease, which may limit their use.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: