Intravascular ultrasound is more sensitive than angiography and serves as the optimal diagnostic tool for early detection and quantification of cardiac allograft vasculopathy.
What are the available and optimal diagnostic methods for detecting cardiac allograft vasculopathy in cardiac transplant recipients?
Intravascular ultrasound is highlighted as the optimal diagnostic tool for early detection of cardiac allograft vasculopathy, overcoming the limitations of routine angiography.
Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), characterized by diffuse intimal thickening and luminal narrowing in the arteries of the allograft, is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in cardiac transplant recipients. Many transplant centers perform routine annual surveillance coronary angiography. However, angiography can underdiagnose or miss CAV due to its diffuse nature. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is more sensitive than angiography. IVUS provides not only accurate information on lumen size, but also quantification of intimal thickening, vessel wall morphology, and composition. IVUS has evolved as a valuable adjunct to angiography and the optimal diagnostic tool for early detection. Noninvasive testing such as dobutamine stress echocardiography and nuclear stress test have shown considerable accuracy in diagnosing significant CAV. Computed tomographic imaging and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging are promising new modalities but require further study. This article reviews the diagnostic methods that are currently available.
Cai et al. (Fri,) conducted a review in Cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Diagnostic imaging modalities (IVUS, angiography, noninvasive testing) was evaluated. Intravascular ultrasound is more sensitive than angiography and serves as the optimal diagnostic tool for early detection and quantification of cardiac allograft vasculopathy.