Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring revealed that 21% of patients with untreated borderline clinic hypertension actually had normal daytime ambulatory pressures (white coat hypertension).
Observational (n=292)
How common is white coat hypertension in patients with untreated borderline hypertension?
A significant proportion (21%) of patients with borderline clinic hypertension have normal ambulatory blood pressure, highlighting the risk of misclassification and overdiagnosis due to the white coat effect.
Twenty-one percent of 292 patients with untreated borderline hypertension (clinic diastolic blood pressures persistently between 90 and 104 mm Hg) were found to have normal daytime ambulatory pressures (defined from a population of normotensive subjects). These patients were defined as having "white coat" hypertension, and they were more likely to be female and younger, to weigh less, and to be more recently diagnosed than patients whose pressure was elevated both in the clinic and during ambulatory monitoring. Patients with white coat hypertension did not show a generalized increase of blood pressure lability, nor an exaggerated pressor response while at work. The phenomenon is more pronounced when blood pressure is measured by a physician than by a technician. In such patients, the pressor response may be relatively specific to the physician's office and lead to significant misclassification of hypertension.
Thomas G. Pickering (Fri,) conducted a observational in Untreated borderline hypertension (n=292). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring vs. Clinic blood pressure measurement was evaluated on Normal daytime ambulatory pressures (white coat hypertension). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring revealed that 21% of patients with untreated borderline clinic hypertension actually had normal daytime ambulatory pressures (white coat hypertension).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: