Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
where the ai(t) are scalar functions of t, and the operators Xi are independent of t. It is further required that the Lie algebra 2 generated by the Xi under the commutator product Xi, Xj = XiXj -XjXi be of finite dimension 1. The above is, of course, always true if A (and U) are finite matrix operators. In 1954, W. Miagnus 4 proved that if X1, X2, , Xi is a basis for ?, then the solution of (1) can be expressed in the form U(t) exp( Ei= gi(t)Xj). This representation of U holds, however, only in a neighborhood of the origin. It has been shown by J. Mariani and W. Magnus 3 that even in the case of 2 X 2 matrices a global version of Magnus' result cannot be obtained without severe restrictions on A (t). We will show that if U is a solution of (1), it can be represented in the form
Wei et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: