Direct His-bundle pacing using a new steerable catheter and active fixation lead was successfully achieved in 92% of patients with a standard pacemaker indication.
Observational (n=26)
Is direct His-bundle pacing feasible using a new steerable catheter and 4.1 F screw-in lead in patients with a standard pacemaker indication and preserved His-bundle conduction?
Direct His-bundle pacing is highly feasible (92% success rate) using a novel steerable catheter and active fixation lead system.
INTRODUCTION: Much clinical evidence has shown that right ventricular (RV) apical pacing is detrimental to left ventricular function. Preservation of the use of the His-Purkinje (H-P) system may be ideal in heart block that is restricted to the AV node, but may be of no benefit when H-P disease exists. AIM: To investigate the feasibility of direct His-bundle pacing (DHBP) using a new system consisting of a steerable catheter and a new 4.1 F screw-in lead. METHOD: Between May and December 2004, 26 patients (19 male, mean age: 77 +/- 5 years) with a standard pacemaker (PM) indication and preserved His-bundle conduction were enrolled and DHBP was attempted. RESULTS: DHBP was achieved in 24 patients (92%); two patients were paced in the His area, but the paced QRS morphology and duration were different from the native QRS. The mean time for lead positioning was 19 +/- 17 minutes, the mean fluoroscopy time was 11 +/- 8 minutes, and the total procedure time (skin-to-skin including positioning of a quadripolar diagnostic catheter for His recording) was 75 +/- 18 minutes. In DHBP pacing, the acute pacing threshold was 2.3 +/- 1.0 V at a pulse duration of 0.5 msec, and the sensed potentials were 2.9 +/- 2.0 mV. At a 3-month follow-up examination, the same QRS duration and morphology recorded on implantation were observed in all patients. The pacing threshold was 2.8 +/- 1.4 V, and sensed potentials were 2.5 +/- 1.8 mV; the sensing configuration was changed from bipolar to unipolar in 6 patients to resolve undersensing issues. No major complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This feasibility study shows that DHBP can be accomplished with a new system consisting of a steerable catheter and an active fixation lead in 92% of the patients in whom it was attempted.
Zanon et al. (Wed,) conducted a observational in Standard pacemaker indication and preserved His-bundle conduction (n=26). Direct His-bundle pacing (DHBP) using a steerable catheter and a 4.1 F screw-in lead was evaluated on Successful direct His-bundle pacing (DHBP). Direct His-bundle pacing using a new steerable catheter and active fixation lead was successfully achieved in 92% of patients with a standard pacemaker indication.