Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This paper examines problems that arise in using self-reports of subjective information as predictors in mathematical models. The analysis demonstrates that the social construction of such subjective information makes its use in comparative analysis problematic since both its accuracy and the outcome for which it is employed as a predictor are influenced by the respondent's culture and social location. We argue that subjective information is socially and culturally constructed and, by definition, endogenous in models in which self-reports are used as predictors. Methodologically, this requires that the endogenous status of subjective information be explicitly modeled when it is used as a predictor in structural models. As an illustration of the substantive consequences of group-specific response patterns, we examine the use of self-reported health status in comparing the health levels of Mexican-Americans, blacks, and non-Hispanic whites.
Angel et al. (Wed,) studied this question.