Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
We consider some classical and quantum approximate optimization algorithms with bounded depth. First, we define a class of "local" classical optimization algorithms and show that a single step version of these algorithms can achieve the same performance as the single step QAOA on MAX-3-LIN-2. Second, we show that this class of classical algorithms generalizes a class previously considered in the literaturehirvonen2014large, and also that a single step of the classical algorithm will outperform the single-step QAOA on all triangle-free MAX-CUT instances. In fact, for all but 4 choices of degree, existing single-step classical algorithms already outperform the QAOA on these graphs, while for the remaining 4 choices we show that the generalization here outperforms it. Finally, we consider the QAOA and provide strong evidence that, for any fixed number of steps, its performance on MAX-3-LIN-2 on bounded degree graphs cannot achieve the same scaling as can be done by a class of ``global" classical algorithms. These results suggest that such local classical algorithms are likely to be at least as promising as the QAOA for approximate optimization.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Matthew B. Hastings
Microsoft (United States)
Quantum Information and Computation
Microsoft (United States)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Matthew B. Hastings (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a15810e9b87f33fc69f9d73 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.26421/qic19.13-14-3
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: