Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The quest for energy‐efficient, scalable neuromorphic computing has elevated compute‐in‐memory (CIM) architectures to the forefront of hardware innovation. While memristive memories, such as resistive random‐access memories, phase‐change memory, magneto resistive random‐access memory, and ferroelectric random‐access memories, have been extensively explored for synaptic implementation in CIM architectures, their inherent limitations, including static power dissipation, sneak‐path currents, and interconnect voltage drops, pose significant challenges for large‐scale deployment, particularly at advanced technology nodes. In contrast, capacitive memories offer a compelling alternative by enabling charge‐domain computation with virtually zero static power loss, intrinsic immunity to sneak paths, and simplified selector‐less crossbar operation, while offering superior compatibility with 3D back‐end‐of‐line integration. This perspective highlights the architectural and device‐level advantages of emerging nonvolatile capacitive synapses, including metal–ferroelectric–metal, metal–ferroelectric–semiconductor, ferroelectric field‐effect transistors, and hybrid configurations. We examine how material engineering and interface control can modulate synaptic behavior, capacitive memory window, and multilevel analog storage potential. Furthermore, we explore critical system‐level trade‐offs involving device‐to‐device variation, charge transfer noise, dynamic range, and effective analog resolution. Capacitive memories, we argue with custom‐built stacks, have the potential to become a foundational technology for the next generation of extremely energy‐efficient neuromorphic computing platforms.
Bhardwaj et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: