A claims-based, hospital-wide unplanned readmission measure produced consistent hospital rankings across split validation samples (P=0.71 for difference in rank).
Observational (n=8,018,949)
Yes
All-condition hospitalizations (n=8,018,949)
Hospital-wide readmission measure
Hospital-level, risk-standardized unplanned readmissions within 30 days of discharge, p=0.71
p-value: p=0.71
BACKGROUND: Existing publicly reported readmission measures are condition-specific, representing less than 20% of adult hospitalizations. An all-condition measure may better measure quality and promote innovation. OBJECTIVE: To develop an all-condition, hospital-wide readmission measure. DESIGN: Measure development study. SETTING: 4821 U.S. hospitals. PATIENTS: Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 years or older. MEASUREMENTS: Hospital-level, risk-standardized unplanned readmissions within 30 days of discharge. The measure uses Medicare fee-for-service claims and is a composite of 5 specialty-based, risk-standardized rates for medicine, surgery/gynecology, cardiorespiratory, cardiovascular, and neurology cohorts. The 2007-2008 admissions were randomly split for development and validation. Models were adjusted for age, principal diagnosis, and comorbid conditions. Calibration in Medicare and all-payer data was examined, and hospital rankings in the development and validation samples were compared. RESULTS: The development data set contained 8 018 949 admissions associated with 1 276 165 unplanned readmissions (15.9%). The median hospital risk-standardized unplanned readmission rate was 15.8 (range, 11.6 to 21.9). The 5 specialty cohort models accurately predicted readmission risk in both Medicare and all-payer data sets for average-risk patients but slightly overestimated readmission risk at the extremes. Overall hospital risk-standardized readmission rates did not differ statistically in the split samples (P = 0.71 for difference in rank), and 76% of hospitals' validation-set rankings were within 2 deciles of the development rank (24% were more than 2 deciles). Of hospitals ranking in the top or bottom deciles, 90% remained within 2 deciles (10% were more than 2 deciles) and 82% remained within 1 decile (18% were more than 1 decile). LIMITATION: Risk adjustment was limited to that available in claims data. CONCLUSION: A claims-based, hospital-wide unplanned readmission measure for profiling hospitals produced reasonably consistent results in different data sets and was similarly calibrated in both Medicare and all-payer data. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Leora I. Horwitz
Heart Failure & Transplant
Chohreh Partovian
Dartmouth College
Zhenqiu Lin
Heart Failure & Transplant
Annals of Internal Medicine
Yale New Haven Hospital
Health Research and Educational Trust
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Horwitz et al. (Mon,) conducted a observational in All-condition hospitalizations (n=8,018,949). Hospital-wide readmission measure was evaluated on Hospital-level, risk-standardized unplanned readmissions within 30 days of discharge (p=0.71). A claims-based, hospital-wide unplanned readmission measure produced consistent hospital rankings across split validation samples (P=0.71 for difference in rank).
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a16cd3825571367076b964e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/m13-3000