Fitbit PurePulse photoplethysmography accurately tracked asleep heart rate compared to ECG, with no significant difference in mean asleep HR (mean difference 0.09 bpm, P=0.426) and ICC of 0.998.
Observational (n=35)
Does Fitbit Charge 2 photoplethysmography accurately measure heart rate during sleep compared to three-lead ECG in healthy adults?
Fitbit photoplethysmography accurately tracks heart rate during sleep in healthy young adults compared to reference ECG.
Effect estimate: Mean difference 0.09 bpm
p-value: p=0.426
Elevated asleep heart rate (HR) is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and other-cause morbidity and mortality. We assessed the accuracy of Fitbit Inc. PurePulse® photoplethysmography with reference to three-lead electrocardiography (ECG) in determining HR during sleep. HR of 35 (17 female) healthy adults 25.1 ± 10.6 years of age (mean ± SD) was continuously recorded throughout a single night of sleep. There was no significant difference in asleep HR mean (0.09 beats per minute bpm, P = 0.426) between Fitbit photoplethysmography and ECG; plus, there was excellent intraclass correlation (0.998) and narrow Bland–Altman agreement range (2.67 bpm). The regression analysis of Bland–Altman plot of mean asleep HR indicates Fitbit tends to slightly overestimate reference values in the lower range of HR (HR 80 bpm) by 0.63 bpm. Mixed model analysis of epoch-by-epoch (5-min epochs) asleep HR showed significant “U” shape trend (P 80 bpm) ranges of HR. However, effect of age, body mass index, gender, and subjective sleep quality measured by Pittsburgh sleep quality index (good/poor sleepers) on error in estimating HR by the Fitbit method was not significant. It is concluded that Fitbit photoplethysmography suitably tracks HR during sleep in healthy young adults.
Haghayegh et al. (Tue,) conducted a observational in Healthy adults (n=35). Fitbit Charge 2 PurePulse photoplethysmography vs. Three-lead electrocardiography (ECG) was evaluated on Mean asleep heart rate difference (Mean difference 0.09 bpm, p=0.426). Fitbit PurePulse photoplethysmography accurately tracked asleep heart rate compared to ECG, with no significant difference in mean asleep HR (mean difference 0.09 bpm, P=0.426) and ICC of 0.998.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: