Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
commit a certain crime and also giving him opportunity to commit it under the supervision of a prosecutor or a law enforcement agency, which is carried out in accordance with the law, has been subjected to a critical analysis. In particular, it has been clarified that although such provision echoes the position of the European Court of Human Rights regarding the legality of passive investigation of a crime, it hardly adequately reflects what actually happens during control over the commission of a crime as an undercover investigative (search) action. It has been suggested to indicate in the corresponding norm of the project that an official of a law enforcement agency creates the situation necessary for the realization of the revealed intention to commit a crime (as an option: to use another similar (generalized) wording that will allow to cover activities, which constitute the content of various forms of control over the commission of a crime). It has been proven that the issue of applying criminal law means to a subject provoked by law enforcement officers and their agents requires a qualified solution not only in the context of the admissibility (inadmissibility) of evidence, which the European Court of Human Rights focuses on, but also, in particular, taking into account gravity of the committed criminal offense. the commission of a
O.O. Dudorov (Sat,) studied this question.