The Heart Up! intervention demonstrated feasibility in patients with ischaemic heart disease and hopelessness, achieving a 69.8% enrollment rate and 67% completion rate.
RCT (n=30)
Randomized
No
Does a motivational social support intervention increase physical activity in patients with ischaemic heart disease who report hopelessness?
A motivational social support intervention using text messaging is feasible and acceptable for patients with ischaemic heart disease experiencing hopelessness.
Objective: Hopelessness is present in 27% of patients with ischaemic heart disease (IHD), can persist for 12 months and is associated with lack of physical activity (PA). No interventions have been tested to increase PA in IHD patients who report hopelessness. This study evaluated the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of the Heart Up! intervention, designed to reduce hopelessness through enhanced PA in IHD patients. It was hypothesised that increased PA would be identified in the intervention group. Setting: Patients were recruited from a large teaching hospital in the Midwestern USA. Data collection occurred in the patient’s home at 1 and 8 weeks after hospital discharge. Methods: A three-group design was used. Eligible patients were randomised to (1) motivational social support (MSS) from a nurse, (2) MSS from a nurse with social support from a significant other support (SOS) or (3) control. MSS-only and MSS-SOS recipients received motivational interviewing followed by 6 weeks of social support text messages from a nurse. MSS-SOS participants additionally received social support text messages from a significant other. Control participants received the usual care. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment and retention rates, patient acceptability and patient satisfaction. An accelerometer measured PA. Results: Of the 156 patients screened for the study, 43 met the inclusion criteria. Of eligible patients, 69.8% ( n = 30) enrolled and 67% ( n = 20) completed the study. Patients in the MSS and MSS-SOS groups expressed satisfaction with the intervention components (86% with motivational interviewing, 77% with nurse texts and 100% with significant other texts). Although differences were not statistically significant, a medium effect size for change in PA was identified in the MSS-SOS group compared to the other two groups. Conclusion: Study findings demonstrate the feasibility of the Heart Up! intervention and support testing its efficacy in a randomised controlled trial.
Dunn et al. (Thu,) conducted a rct in Ischaemic heart disease with hopelessness (n=30). Heart Up! intervention (motivational social support with or without significant other support) vs. Usual care was evaluated on Feasibility outcomes (recruitment and retention rates, patient acceptability, and satisfaction). The Heart Up! intervention demonstrated feasibility in patients with ischaemic heart disease and hopelessness, achieving a 69.8% enrollment rate and 67% completion rate.