Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Narrow-diameter implants (NDIs) can be inserted instead of standard dental implants (SDIs) in sites with limited space and bone availability. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of implant diameter on peri-implant bone, attached mucosa, and on the associated probability of implant success and survival. The implants with progressive thread design and platform switching (Ankylos®, Dentsply Sirona; Mannheim, Germany) investigated were identified retrospectively and assigned to two groups based on their diameter: 3.5 mm (NDIs) and 4.5 mm (SDIs). Peri-implant bone loss was analyzed based on available radiographs. Descriptive and implant-associated factors were gathered from patient files. Data were statistically analyzed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov–Lilliefors test and regression analyses. The level of significance was p ≤ 0.05. Results: In total, data for 415 implants in 194 patients were included in the study. Ten-year survival was 95.8% (NDIs) and 91.1% (SDIs). Implant diameter had no significant effect on peri-implant crestal bone loss (p = 0.098) or on the width of the attached gingiva (p = 0.052). Survival and success rates of NDIs were like or slightly better than those of SDIs. Because implant diameter had no effect on peri-implant tissue, NDIs can be recommended in selected cases.
Romanos et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: