This corrected and expanded manuscript formulates the Fractal Consistency Law (FCL) as an Ontology of Admissibility. It corrects three weaknesses of the previous version: the 27 principles are now developed and explained inside the paper; the core equations are inserted as Word-native Office Math objects (OMML); and all comparative tables are reconstructed with fixed widths and landscape layout where needed, so they remain within page margins. The paper argues that reality cannot be reduced either to absolute Nothingness or to infinite Singularity. It must persist within a finite and non-null corridor of admissibility. From that corridor, the FCL develops a structured sequence: latent non-null Being, fractal deployment, ontological admissibility, selection by minimum inconsistency, residuality, fractal rewriting, nesting, inheritance, variation, fecundity, infertility, maturation, Ancestor State, non-return to Nothingness, ontological irreversibility, conservation of grammar, ontological seed, germination, continuity without identity, ontological lineage, genealogical selection, ontogenerative closure, epistemic demarcation, and falsifiable operationalization. The paper does not claim that every speculative module is empirically confirmed. Instead, it establishes a hierarchy of epistemic status. The impossibility of Nothingness and the exclusion of infinite Singularity belong to the ontological-formal layer. PAF, Meta-PAF, universe-child, ontological seed, and germination belong to the physical-metaphysical hypothesis layer. RFT and FCM/MCF are the most immediately operational modules because they can be projected onto cosmological expansion, growth of structure, dark-sector phenomenology, lensing-dynamics relations, and possible black-hole boundary signatures. The final section defines how the FCL must become falsifiable: each physical module must specify observables, datasets, rival models, statistical metrics, and conditions of possible failure. The manuscript therefore closes the foundational block of the Fractal Consistency Law without closing the research program: the next task is mathematical hardening, operational modelling, and empirical confrontation.
César Daniel Reyna Ugarriza (Sat,) studied this question.