The teleportation of macroscopic matter remains one of the most challengingopen problems in theoretical physics. Quantum teleportation, though experimentally verified Bennett et al., 1993, transfers only information, not matter itself;moreover, the scale required to describe a human being (approximately 1027 atoms)renders any copy-and-destroy approach entirely impractical. Traversable wormholes, proposed by Morris and Thorne 1988, offer a geometric alternative, but faceobstacles of global topology, distributed exotic matter, and gravitational instability.We present an alternative and original formulation: macroscopic teleportation via wormhole in a closed system. The central idea is to reformulatetravel as a process in which the interior of a “travel capsule” remains completelyisolated from the exterior throughout the journey A → B, with a causal validation protocol applied a posteriori at B verifying the conservation of energy, charge,and momentum. This reformulation reduces the problem of global topology to acoordination problem between two points — conceptually far more tractable.To express spacetime coordinates in a unified way we employ quaternions q =t+xi+yj+zk, encoding time and space simultaneously in a single algebraic object.Quaternionic interpolation along the wormhole provides a natural parametrisationof the internal trajectory. Finally, we present a computational analogy in Q#that illustrates the logical structure of the protocol without claiming to simulategravity.The five original contributions of this formulation are: (1) the closed-systemconcept as the central organiser of the protocol; (2) causal validation as a concreteoperational procedure; (3) quaternions as a unified language for spacetime; (4) thereduction of complex topology to A → B coordination; (5) the conceptual integration of Q# and General Relativity. We discuss honestly the physical and engineeringobstacles that separate this formulation from any practical implementation.
Guilherme Moura Fernandes (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: