Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This essay probes tensions between our professional practices and the quality of our professional output in the field of international studies. We organize ourselves into academic ''sects'' that engage in selfaffirming research and then wage theological debates between academic religions. This occurs at both the level of theory and epistemology. Unfortunately, this academic sectarianism produces less understanding rather than more. Theoretically, we should focus on developing contingent, mid-level theories of specific phenomena. Epistemologically, we should recognize there are multiple valid and perhaps even complementary paths to understanding.
David A. Lake (Mon,) studied this question.