Abstract In recent years, there has been a growing recognition of the colonial legacies that shape Western cultural institutions. Such public engagement, however, risks falling prey to oversimplification and becoming empty. Museums, in particular, have faced a deep crisis of legitimacy in connection to the growth of the public awareness over past lootings and other cultural misappropriations. If this popular momentum runs ashore in its pars destruens , however, it will lose its potential to inspire profound societal change. Against this backdrop, the present case note offers an in-depth analysis of the experience of the Musée d’ethnographie de Genève (MEG) , which has recently reopened its doors to the public with a new mission of decolonization. This case note investigates how a museum—especially one with a problematic past, such as an ethnographic institution—can critically confront its colonial heritage while keeping the public informed and actively involved in the process.
Livia Solaro (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: