East Asian patients exhibit an 'East Asian paradox' with a significantly higher proportion having a higher probability of bleeding than ischemia compared to non-East Asian patients (32.3% vs 0.4%, p<0.001).
What are the optimal antithrombotic therapies for East Asian patients after acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention?
This review highlights the need for tailored antithrombotic strategies in East Asian patients post-ACS or PCI due to their unique ischemia and bleeding risk profile.
Because guidelines and recommendations in response to multiple randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of new therapies undergo rapid changes, antithrombotic therapies for patients after acute coronary syndrome, or percutaneous coronary intervention, are becoming more complex in daily clinical practice. The proportion of Asian populations enrolled in landmark RCTs is substantially low, which limits the direct application of trial findings into clinical practice in Asian countries. Moreover, compared with Caucasian patients, East Asian patients are considered to have a different ischemia/bleeding propensity in response to antithrombotic therapy, known as the "East Asian paradox" (ie, more bleeding events but fewer thromboembolic events). Coincident with consecutive RCTs in Western populations to optimize antithrombotic strategies, several such studies have now been conducted in East Asian cohorts. Herein, we provide a comprehensive summary of the key RCTs in this regard and propose future directions and perspectives for optimal antithrombotic therapies in East Asian patients.
Kwon et al. (Tue,) conducted a review in Acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention. Antithrombotic therapy was evaluated. East Asian patients exhibit an 'East Asian paradox' with a significantly higher proportion having a higher probability of bleeding than ischemia compared to non-East Asian patients (32.3% vs 0.4%, p<0.001).