Implantable loop-recorder monitoring in patients with unexplained syncope revealed a higher syncope recurrence rate in patients aged ≥65 years compared to those <65 years (56% vs 32%, P=0.03).
Observational (n=103)
Yes
Does the diagnostic yield of the implantable loop-recorder (ILR) in unexplained syncope differ between patients aged >=65 years and <65 years?
In patients with unexplained syncope, ILR implantation has a higher diagnostic yield in older patients (>=65 years) due to a higher syncope recurrence rate compared to younger patients.
Effect estimate: OR 2.7
Absolute Event Rate: 56% vs 32%
p-value: p=0.03
Objectives To evaluate the usage and diagnostic yield of the implantable loop-recorder (ILR) in detection of the mechanism of syncope and in guiding therapy in patients aged R65 years and comparing them with those !65 years. Design This was a two-hospital, observational, prospective study in consecutive patients with unexplained syncope who underwent an ILR implantation. Between November 1997 and December 2002, a total of 2052 patients with syncope were evaluated (local population of 590,000 inhabitants). The diagnosis remained unexplained in 371 (18%). Of these, 103 patients (5% of the total, 28% of those with unexplained syncope) received an ILR. Results There were 70 (76%) patients aged R65 years and 25 (24%) !65 years. ILR implantation was 110 and 9 per million inhabitants per year, respectively. During a mean follow-up of 14 G 10 months, syncope was recorded in 52 patients. Compared with younger patients those older had a 2.7 higher syncope recurrence rate (56% vs 32%, P Z 0.03); arrhythmias were 3.1 times more likely to be
Brignole et al. (Sun,) conducted a observational in Unexplained syncope (n=103). Implantable loop-recorder (ILR) vs. Patients <65 years was evaluated on Syncope recurrence (OR 2.7, p=0.03). Implantable loop-recorder monitoring in patients with unexplained syncope revealed a higher syncope recurrence rate in patients aged ≥65 years compared to those <65 years (56% vs 32%, P=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: