Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Resource constraints complicate load monitoring practices in some academies, which is problematic based on load‐injury associations surrounding periods of rapid non‐linear growth. Limited research has explored relationships between maturation and perceived psycho‐physiological response to activity and associated neuromuscular performance changes. This study aimed to quantify neuromuscular and psycho‐physiological responses to standardised activity and analyse whether dose‐responses were moderated by maturation. Fifty‐seven male soccer players (age: 14.1 ± 0.9 years; stature: 165 ± 10 cm; body mass, 57 ± 9 kg; percentage of predicted adult height 92.7 ± 5%) from two Elite Player Performance Plan (EPPP) academies completed the youth soccer‐specific aerobic fitness test (Y‐SAFT 60 ). Countermovement jump (CMJ), reactive strength index (RSI), absolute (ABS) and relative leg stiffness (REL) were measured pre–post the Y‐SAFT 60 with playerload (PL), heart rate (HR), total distance (TD ist ) and differential ratings of perceived exertion (dRPE) used as markers of load and intensity. A moderation model was employed to analyse interactions of maturation as a continuous variable. Analysis indicated no significant interaction ( p <0.05 ) between maturation and neuromuscular performance but RPE‐Technical demonstrated significant interactions ( p = 0.01). Slope analysis indicated four variables (PL, RSI, ABS and REL) that demonstrated significance at various stages of maturation, most notably aligning with peak height velocity (∼87–96% PAH). Tentatively, we propose that maturational developments in the neuromuscular system offer some mechanistic explanation to the varied dose‐responses observed. It is therefore important that maturation is habitually considered within prescription of training programmes and that further empirical studies are completed to determine maturity specific dose‐responses.
Salter et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: