March 9, 2002Open Access

Accuracy of information on apparently credible websites: survey of five common health topics

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

conception and design of the study, collection of data on links, interpretation of data, and drafting of the paper. NQM carried out the statistical analysis. KKH, FCA, MIR, HMK, and REP were involved

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Heinke Kunst (Sat,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1b3f455433ff9ab7969703 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7337.581

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Clinical websites are currently dangerous to health2001 · 46 citations
2Melanoma Information on the Internet: Often Incomplete—A Public Health Opportunity?2002 · 37 citations
3The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine1998 · 16,018 citations
4Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware.1997 · 878 citations
5Use of the Web for Medical Information by a Gastroenterology Clinic Population2000 · 118 citations

Bookmark

View Full Paper