Incidental VTE in cancer patients was associated with a numerically lower incidence of recurrent VTE (4.3% vs 7.4%; HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.29-1.10) compared to symptomatic VTE.
RCT (n=1,155)
Effect estimate: HR 0.57 (95% CI 0.29-1.10)
Absolute Event Rate: 4.3% vs 7.4%
BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines advise similar anticoagulant treatment for symptomatic and incidental cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). We investigated clinical features and outcomes of cancer patients with incidental or symptomatic VTE randomized in the Caravaggio study. OBJECTIVES: We performed a predefined sub-analysis of the Caravaggio study in order to investigate the clinical features and outcomes of incidental and symptomatic VTE in patients with cancer. The relative efficacy and safety of apixaban and dalteparin in patients with incidental and symptomatic VTE was also assessed. METHODS: The Caravaggio study compared apixaban to dalteparin for the 6-month treatment of cancer-associated VTE. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were recurrent VTE and major bleeding. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty patients (20%) had incidental and 925 (80%) symptomatic VTE. Pulmonary embolism with or without deep vein thrombosis as index event, colorectal cancer, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0, and locally advanced or metastatic cancer were more frequent in patients with incidental VTE. Deep vein thrombosis as index event, hematological cancer, and ECOG score of 2 were more frequent in patients with symptomatic VTE. Ten patients (4.3%) with incidental and 68 (7.4%) with symptomatic VTE had recurrent VTE (hazard ratio HR 0.57, 95% confidence interval CI 0.29-1.10). Major bleeding occurred in 12 (5.2%) patients with incidental VTE and in 33 (3.6%) patients with symptomatic VTE (HR 1.43, 95% CI 0.74-2.77). When comparing apixaban to dalteparin in patients with symptomatic and incidental VTE, the HR for recurrence was 0.73 (95% CI 0.45-1.19) and 0.41 (95% CI 0.11-1.56), respectively, and the HR for major bleeding 0.93 (95% CI 0.47-1.83) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.31-2.96), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to cancer patients with symptomatic VTE, those with incidental VTE have different clinical features at presentation, with a numerically lower incidence of recurrent VTE and a numerically higher incidence of major bleeding.
Giustozzi et al. (Wed,) conducted a rct in Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (n=1,155). Incidental VTE vs. Symptomatic VTE was evaluated on Recurrent VTE (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.29-1.10). Incidental VTE in cancer patients was associated with a numerically lower incidence of recurrent VTE (4.3% vs 7.4%; HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.29-1.10) compared to symptomatic VTE.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: