Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Popper (building on Eccles and Popper 1977) appears to be offering a deductive argument, which can be reconstructed as follows:1. Phenomenal properties evolved.2. If epiphenomenalism is true, phenomenal properties are useless.3. Useless features do not evolve.4. Therefore, epiphenomenalism is false.
Hedda Hassel Mørch (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: