This review summarizes the evidence regarding arrhythmia progression, outcomes, and the efficacy of rate and rhythm control strategies in young patients with asymptomatic atrial fibrillation.
Does rate or rhythm control (medication or catheter ablation) improve prognosis in young patients with asymptomatic atrial fibrillation compared to leaving the arrhythmia untreated?
This review evaluates the evidence for treating versus not treating asymptomatic atrial fibrillation in young patients using rate or rhythm control strategies.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia and has gained increasingly more attention due to new treatment options, particularly catheter ablation. Growing experience with this technique and better AF suppression compared with antiarrhythmic medication have paved the way for its extended use and indication. At this point, it is recommended for symptomatic patients if antiarrhythmic drugs failed and in selected young symptomatic patients as first line therapy. It is a tempting concept to improve prognosis in young AF patients by rhythm control irrespective of symptoms. In this review, we summarize epidemiological data on young AF, efficacy, and limitations of rate and rhythm control by means of medication and catheter ablation in young patients, information on arrhythmia progression and outcome, and the consequences of these data for AF treatment in young, asymptomatic patients.
Wasmer et al. (Mon,) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation. Rate and rhythm control (medication and catheter ablation) was evaluated. This review summarizes the evidence regarding arrhythmia progression, outcomes, and the efficacy of rate and rhythm control strategies in young patients with asymptomatic atrial fibrillation.