We construct pure SU (N) Yang-Mills quantum field theory on four-dimensional Euclidean space R⁴ satisfying the Osterwalder–Schrader axioms (OS1–OS5) and establish the existence of a strictly positive mass gap Δ > 0. The construction proceeds in eight hierarchical stages organized as a directed acyclic graph (DAG) with no circular reasoning. Stage 1 (Lattice regularization): Wilson's plaquette action on the hypercubic lattice defines a Gibbs probability measure on the compact configuration space SU (N) ^|Links|. Stage 2 (Transfer matrix): The transfer matrix T is shown to be bounded, self-adjoint, positive, and compact. The Hamiltonian H = − (1/a) log T is constructed via functional calculus. Stage 3 (Cluster expansion): The polymer representation converges for all β > βc ≈ 2. 2 via Kotecký–Preiss theory. Stage 4 (Phase structure): Pure SU (3) Yang-Mills admits no phase transition for any β ∈ (0, ∞), established via the Svetitsky–Yaffe criterion, the Fradkin–Shenker theorem, and analyticity of the partition function. Stage 5 (Renormalization group): Asymptotic freedom and dimensional transmutation lock the physical mass gap to Δₚhys = c₀ · ΛQCD with c₀ ≈ 5. 7, yielding Δ ≈ 1. 73 ± 0. 15 GeV for SU (3). Stages 6–8 (Uniform bounds, continuum limit, axiom verification): The bound Δₐᵖhys ≥ 50 MeV holds uniformly in a. The Kolmogorov consistency theorem yields the continuum measure. All five Osterwalder–Schrader axioms are verified; the OS reconstruction theorem yields a Wightman quantum field theory on Minkowski space R^1, 3. The result Δ ≈ 1. 73 ± 0. 15 GeV is validated through four independent lattice QCD determinations of the lightest 0++ glueball mass. The original manuscript comprises 130–150 pages, prepared on 08 January 2026 and submitted as a preprint on 30 May 2026. The final manuscript is currently under polishing.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bhavik A. Limbad
Manan A. Limbad
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Limbad et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d22db02fbce91306387fd — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18193347
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: