Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The linguistic properties of the FAAF test material are expounded in relation to its objectives. It is shown from reference data that there are lexical effects inherent in the use of real-word minimal pairs rather than nonsense syllables. These are word-frequency effects upon phonemes in initial position and effects of imageability upon phonemes in final position. However, those effects are not large enough to undermine the use of the FAAF as an acoustical phonetically structured material reflecting the analysis of auditory information. Normative data on a range of signal-to-noise ratios are presented. These data have helped to delimit the subsets of items that best reflect variations in performance under easy and under difficult conditions. This offers a mapping of the percentage correct from scores at one or two fixed S/N ratios required for a given level of performance and hence permits comparison with SRT(N) measures.
Foster et al. (Thu,) studied this question.