Do commercially available chest protectors reduce the viscous response (fatality risk for commotio cordis) compared to an unprotected chest when impacted by a baseball?
The majority of commercially available chest protectors fail to provide consistent reductions in commotio cordis risk, highlighting the need for improved safety equipment and standardized testing.
BACKGROUND: In a recent study of fatal chest impacts by baseballs, 28% of the children were wearing a chest protector. This study evaluates the effectiveness of chest protectors in reducing the risk of commotio cordis. METHODS: Five commercially available chest protectors were placed on a three-rib structure simulating the chest and impacted at 40, 50, 60, and 70 miles per hour by a standard baseball. Ten repeated tests were conducted on each vest in random order, and on the control (unprotected chest). The viscous response (or viscous criterion VC) was used to assess differences in fatality risk. RESULTS: One vest had a statistically lower VC (average, 50.6%, p < 0.05) for all impact speeds. Three averaged 18.7% to 27.7% lower VC, but were significantly different only at higher speeds. One vest had an average 34.2% higher VC, and was significantly higher at 40 to 50 miles per hour (p < 0.05). A method was proposed linking laboratory test results to real-world incidents of ventricular fibrillation. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of commercially available chest protectors fail to provide consistent reductions in commotio cordis risk. Nonetheless, there are benefits from their use in baseball until improved safety equipment is developed and standard tests are established to assess sport equipment effectiveness.
Viano et al. (Fri,) studied this question.