In its recent position statement, the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) emphasized that the evidence base for gender-related surgeries in pediatric and adolescent patients is limited, mental health benefits are supported by low-certainty evidence, and irreversible interventions carry potential long-term harms, recommending a minimum age threshold of 19 years for surgery. This article evaluates the ethical basis of irreversible gender-affirming surgeries in young adults aged 19 and above, considering mental health outcomes, mortality, complication profiles, and neurodevelopmental maturation. The discussion is framed around three normative axes: evidential sufficiency, the irreversible nature of the intervention, and developmental continuity of decision-making capacity. Current literature indicates that some individuals may experience short-term subjective well-being or relief of dysphoria, yet high-certainty evidence for long-term mental health normalization or reduction of psychiatric risk is lacking. This asymmetry necessitates caution in the timing of irreversible gender-affirming surgery (GAS) procedures. Consequently, when evaluated through the lenses of the precautionary principle, nonmaleficence, and proportionality, establishing a minimum age threshold of 25 for irreversible GAS appears ethically and normatively justified.
Zeki Bayraktar (Sat,) studied this question.