The palace, the city and the past: controversies surrounding the rebuilding of the Gyeongbok Palace in Seoul, 1990–2010

Abstract In step with economic and political growth, the Korean government is in the process of restoring the main palace, the Gyeongbok Palace, of the Joseon Dynasty (1392–1910), which was destroyed by the Japanese during the colonial era (1910–1945). The ensuing public debate regarding the method and extent of the restoration has brought to the fore the significance such a project carries in Korean society of the twenty‐first century. The restoration of this palace complex has created a number of controversies relating to history and the built environment, urban morphology and national identity. Questions about historical authenticity, both in terms of what has happened to the site since the palace was destroyed and the best means of restoring it; questions about the historical origins of Seoul and the need to restore the palace to make its role in this clear; questions about the methods and materials of restoration, are all matters of debate. There are also cultural and political issues: the role of the built environment in aiding public education; sustaining a sense of national identity; encouraging the development of traditional craftsmen's techniques for public benefit; bolstering self‐confidence for national progress and expanding the infrastructure for the Korean tourism industry. This paper argues that not only is the physical restoration of the 'new' historic buildings and structures important, but also the cultural and social meanings (as outlined above), and that these justify the controversial restoration of the national historic monument. Keywords: historic urban plansconservation issuesurban tourismKorean heritagepublic participation Acknowledgements Helpful comments by Sohyun Park and Yongsook Huh improved this paper. Notes 1. Editorial, 'With Korean People's Abilities and Self‐Esteem', Dong‐A Ilbo, August 11, 1993. 2. As a government employee I was involved in the restoration project of the palace from 1999 to 2001. 3. Dong‐Hyeon Kim, Palace Architecture in Seoul in Korean (Seoul: Sigongsa, 2002), 18–20. 4. Ibid. , 20. 5. Dong‐Uk Kim, 'The City and Architecture of Seoul during the Late Chosobreven Period', Korea Journal 34, no. 3 (1994): 55. 6. Dong‐Hyeon Kim, Palace Architecture in Seoul, 25–8. 7. Andrew C. Nahm, A Panorama of 5000 Years: Korean History (Seoul: Hollym, 1983), 90–1. 8. Ibid. , 91. 9. Ibid. 10. Dong‐Hyeon Kim, Palace Architecture in Seoul, 30–1. 11. Ibid. , 31. 12. Soon‐Yong Jang, 'Restoration Plan of the Gyeongbok Palace and Other Areas', in Report for the Restoration of the Gwanghwa Gate and Other Areas of the Gyeongbok Palace in Korean (Daejeon: Cultural Heritage Administration, 2002), 207–8. 13. Chung‐Dong Kim, Remaining History Vanishing Buildings in Korean (Seoul: Daewonsa, 2000), 227–40. 14. 'Public Opinion Poll by the Office of the President', Dong‐A Ilbo, August 10, 1993, 29. 15. Cultural Heritage Administration. Report for the Restoration of the Gyeongbok Palace in Korean. Seoul: Cultural Heritage Administration, 1994, 13. 16. Cultural Heritage Administration. Gyeongbok Palace: Report for the Completion of the Heungye Gate Area in Korean. Daejeon: Cultural Heritage Administration, 2001, 49. 17. On the levels of intervention, see James Marston Fitch, Historic Preservation: Curatorial Management of the Built World (Charlottesville/London: The University Press of Virginia, 1982), 44–7. 18. Myeong‐Cheol Oh, 'The Jaseondang Pavilion Came Back', Dong‐A Ilbo, December 31, 1995, 29. 19. Ibid. 20. Hyeong‐Jun Shin, 'A Ritual for the Reconstructed Heungye Gate', Chosun Ilbo, October 27, 2001, 21. 21. Cultural Heritage Administration. Report for the Restoration of the Gyeongbok Palace, 270. 22. Yu‐Seong Hwang, 'The 30th Garrison, the Birthplace of Political Military Officers, is Moving', Dong‐A Ilbo, December 16, 1996, 37. 23. Ibid. 24. James H. Hausaman and Jeong Il‐Hwa, U. S. Army Captain Who Controlled the Korean Presidents in Korean (Seoul: Hangukmoonwon, 1995), 147. 25. Editorial, 'Demolish the Ghost of the Japanese Government‐General of Korea', Dong‐A Ilbo, October 27, 1990. 26. Myeong‐Cheol Oh, 'Demolition of the Former Japanese Government‐General Building', Dong‐A Ilbo, August 10, 1993, 3. 27. Hyeon‐Hui Lee, 'The Japanese Government‐General Building should be Demolished', Korea Forum in Korean 13, no. 1 (1990): 104–10; Ki‐In Jang, 'The Old Governor‐General Building in Seoul', Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea in Korean 35, no. 3 (1991): 50–1; Min‐Koo Song, 'A Proposal for Relocation of the Old Government‐General Building', Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea in Korean 35, no. 3 (1991): 73. 28. Sang‐Hae Lee, 'The Issues of Restoring the Kyongbok Palace and Kyonghi Palace, and Removing the Old Governor‐General Building', Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea in Korean 35, no. 2 (1991): 53–6; and Chung‐Dong Kim, 'A Problem of the Chosun Government‐General Building in Seoul', Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea in Korean 35, no. 3 (1991): 77. 29. Min‐Koo Song, 'A Proposal for Relocation', 73. 30. Ibid. 31. Muneyoshi Yanagi, 'For a Korean Architecture being Vanished', Reorganization in Japanese (September 1922), quoted in Jeong‐Mok Son, 'Study on the Erection of the Japanese Government‐General Building and Seoul City Hall', Hyangto Seoul in Korean, no. 48 (1989): 84–5. 32. Cultural Heritage Administration. Preservation and Management of Cultural Heritage in Korean. Daejeon: Cultural Heritage Administration, 2001, 15. 33. Ibid. 34. Report to the Minister of Culture and Tourism by the Administrator of the Cultural Heritage Administration (May 11, 1999). 35. Ibid. 36. Ibid. 37. The committee was composed of Korean architectural historians. 38. Report to the Minister of Culture and Tourism by the Administrator of the Cultural Heritage Administration (May 11, 1999). 39. Ibid. 40. Ibid. 41. Cultural Heritage Administration. Standard Specifications for the Restoration of Cultural Heritage in Korean. Seoul: Cultural Heritage Administration, 1994, 51. 42. Gyu‐Tae Lee, 'Timber for Palace Architecture', Chosun Ilbo, August 25, 1999, 7. 43. Ibid. 44. Cheol‐Hui Lee and Gwang‐Pyo Lee, 'Imported Wooden Members', Dong‐A Ilbo, August 21, 1999, 25. 45. Sang‐Hae Lee, 'The Issues of Restoring', 53–6. 46. Ibid. , 52. 47. David Lowenthal, The Past Is a Foreign Country (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), 281–2. 48. Ibid. , 41, 44. 49. Frederick Wyatt, 'The Reconstruction of the Individual and of the Collective Past', in The Study of Lives: Essays on Personality in Honor of Henry a Murray, ed. Robert W. White (New York: Atherton, 1963), 319. 50. Kevin Lynch, What Time is this Place? ed. Jeanne Schulkind, 10th ed. (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1972), 61. 51. Gwang‐Pyo Lee, 'The Shrine for Royal Concubines of the Joseon Dynasty Opened to the Public after 34 Years' Closing', Dong‐A Ilbo, November 21, 2001, 30. 52. David Lowenthal, The Past is a Foreign Country, 26. 53. Andrew C. Nahm, Korea: Tradition and Transformation: A History of the Korean People, 434–6. 54. Thayer Watkins, 'The Regimes of Chun Doo Hwan and Roh Tae Woo in South Korea', San José State University. http: //www2. sjsu. edu/faculty/watkins/chunᵣoh. htm (accessed January 15, 2009). 55. Cheryl M. Hargrove, 'Heritage Tourism', CRM Bulletin 25, no. 1 (2002): 10.